I think Anthony meant is it as wide as a standard fm broadcast radio signal
or considerably less so as TV audio is. I can't recall what TV audio
generally is but I think the deviation is quite a bit less than radio. Lou
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> You wouldn't think so. Tuning in a station with wider deviation on a
> decent FM broadcast receiver would make the station sound awful.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 03:25 PM 3/13/2008 -0500, you wrote:
> >Anthony,
> >that's a good question. Having not heard it, I can't say for sure but my
> >guess is that yes it's the same deviation as standard FM radio stations.
> >Lou
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 5:13 AM
> >Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> >
> >
> > > Do you think the band with is any wider?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:01 PM
> > > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> > >
> > >
> > > > They're already using the channel 6 audio space for a new FM station
> > > > serving
> > > > the New York City area. Known as the Pulse. Don't know the call
> >letters.
> > > > Lou
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:01 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for
> >when
> > > >> everything is mandated to go digital? I'm mainly talking about
2-3-4
> >and
> > > >> 5-6. I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and
> >it's
> > > >> either P-25 digital or penSky. the 470-512 MHz range is already
being
> > > >> used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
> > > >> conventional and trunking. Someone was wonderin if the very low
VHF TV
> > > >> freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands? I.E. TV
> >channels
> > > >> 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters? I think taht would be
wishfull
> > > >> thinking though.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Yes. =20
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > > >> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
> > > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
> > > >> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > >> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> > > >> >
> > > >> > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on
UHF or
> > > >> > VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case
the
> > > >> > local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I
don't
> > > >> > sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
> > > >> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
> > > >> > Subject: unused frequencies
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about
> > > > anything=20
> > > >> > > above =3D 10 meters. I will say that I hae noticed not much
going
> >on
> > > > =
> > > >> > on
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > 10-20. 40 a=3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if
this
> > > >> > > is
> > > > =
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > normal for this time=3D of year and the current stage of the
sun
> > > > spot=20
> > > >> > > cycle.
> > > >> > >=20
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG.
> >Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1328 - Release Date:
3/13/2008
> >11:31 AM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
>
|
