BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:13:26 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Do you think the band with is any wider?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: unused frequencies


> They're already using the channel 6 audio space for a new FM station 
> serving
> the New York City area.  Known as the Pulse.  Don't know the call letters.
> Lou
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:01 PM
> Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>
>
>> uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for when
>> everything is mandated to go digital?  I'm mainly talking about 2-3-4 and
>> 5-6.  I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and it's
>> either P-25 digital  or penSky.  the 470-512 MHz range is already being
>> used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
>> conventional and trunking.  Someone was wonderin if the very low VHF TV
>> freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands?  I.E. TV channels
>> 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters?  I think taht would be wishfull
>> thinking though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>>
>> > Yes.  =20
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: For blind ham radio operators
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>> >
>> > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF or
>> > VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case the
>> > local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I don't
>> > sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
>> > Subject: unused frequencies
>> >
>> >
>> > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about
> anything=20
>> > > above =3D 10 meters.  I will say that I hae noticed not much going on
> =
>> > on
>> >
>> > > 10-20.  40 a=3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if this 
>> > > is
> =
>> >
>> > > normal for this time=3D of year and the current stage of the sun
> spot=20
>> > > cycle.
>> > >=20
>> >
>>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2