Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:59:14 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ok here's my 2 1/2 cents worth. I believe that when you get a group health
plan such as the one employeers have available there is an assumed group
risk. I do know of people who have tried to get individual insurance and
were denied for being a bit overweight according to the companies charts.
Beth t. the OT
-----Original Message-----
From: Cerebral Palsy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
ken barber
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News
good point, kat. it is going to get to be a point of contention in public
discussion and will find its way into politics. i would think it will get to
a point that a line will have to be drawn. maybe at the self inflicted
problems. but, then we get into what is self inflicted. i personally think
that some overweight people have it in their genes, others thinks it is all
a will power thing. and that will be true of so other ills.
--- Kathleen Salkin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> You do have a valid point, Ken but what's next, penalizing people
> because they're overweight? Yes, I think we'll be at that point soon.
> And then what's next, charging higher premiums for group members with
> disabilities because they incur higher costs?
>
> Kat
>
> On 12 Mar 2006, at 20:42, ken barber wrote:
>
> > just to stir the pudding a little. yes, there is privacy rights, but
> > then should employers have to
> pay
> > higher insurance rates for what someone decides to
> do
> > at their home? one might have to give up some
> rights
> > to keep from trampling on the rights of employers
> to
> > not hire someone who is going to drive up his cost
> of
> > doing business. stir it up just a bit.
>
|
|
|