Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:01:08 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kenneth Anderson wrote:
> Following the reactions to “How fire made us human” it seems that
> this Paleofood Digest” is irrevocably devoted to a raw meat, no carb
> diet, with only a few rarely heard other voices.
Works for me and others. There must be some who fail to thrive on it
given a fair chance, but I have not heard of them.
> Cordain's diet deserves the title Paleodiet, even if a few isolated
> hunters ate mainly raw food.
Title? Aaargh! This should not be a popularity contest. A diet should be
what people ate, not what someone claimed that they ate.
It was Human to develop fire and cook
> our meat, it was mainly Prehuman to eat raw meat.
"To err is human", but also self-destructive. See Kouchakoff, Mercola on
raw meat etc. The assumption seems to be that paleolithic man was as
stupid as neolithic.
Those of you who
> have health conditions which only respond to raw meat seem to be
> making a virtue of a fault.
>
Those who have good health also respond well to raw zero carb. I see
nothing wrong with food that supports the immune system and does no harm.
Cordain's diet contains anti-nutrients.
William
|
|
|