Lou,
I'll bet those frequencies are already sold.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 00:18
Subject: Re: Vacated tv channels
> I'm sure that they will try to auction off the frequencies.
>
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>
>
>
> At 06:17 PM 3/12/2008 -0400, you wrote:
>>I don't know, but wifi I don't think would work out well. With E skip or
>>with the top of the sunspot cycle and the way those freqs are I don't
>>know. What about teh VHF high freqs? The lower ones couldn't be usefull
>>for any kind of trunking either for the same reasons, but the VHF high
>>could.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>>
>> > Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation? I
>> > cannot imagine this for cell but could it work for some extended wyfi?
>> > Just thinking tactually. =20
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: For blind ham radio operators
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>> >
>> > uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for
>> > when
>> > everything is mandated to go digital? I'm mainly talking about 2-3-4
>> > and 5-6. I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and
>> > it's either P-25 digital or penSky. the 470-512 MHz range is already
>> > being used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
>> > conventional and trunking. Someone was wonderin if the very low VHF TV
>> > freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands? I.E. TV
>> > channels
>> > 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters? I think taht would be wishfull
>> > thinking though.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yes. =3D20
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: For blind ham radio operators
>> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
>> > > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>> > >
>> > > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF
>> > > or=20
>> > > VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case
>> > > the=20
>> > > local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I
>> > > don't=20
>> > > sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
>> > > Subject: unused frequencies
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about=20
>> > > > anything=3D20 above =3D3D 10 meters. I will say that I hae noticed
>> > > > =
>> > not=20
>> > > > much going on =3D
>> > > on
>> > >
>> > > > 10-20. 40 a=3D3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if =
>> > this=20
>> > > > is =3D
>> > >
>> > > > normal for this time=3D3D of year and the current stage of the
>> > > > sun=20
>> > > >spot=3D20 cycle.
>> > > >=3D20
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG.
>>Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release Date: 3/12/2008
>>1:27 PM
>
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
>
>
>
>
|
