>Your day's results shows a low of 89, a high of 109, and an average of  
>95.  That may be higher than you'd like, but it doesn't seem alarming to  
>me.  The optimal range varies depending on who you are (and who you ask),  
>but you're within the "90 to 110" range even after meals, which doesn't  
>seem bad.  (Note that if you were consistently lower in the past and this  
>is a new higher range, that might be more of an issue.)

Thanks - that makes me feel better. I do know that protein and fat also
elevate BG but I guess I was expecting it to be less.

>My personal philosophy is if you are truly hungry, you should eat.  If  
>you're just fasting because you want to, that's one thing, but constant  
>hunger just for the sake of a schedule doesn't sound like much fun to me.

I am thinking there is something wrong with my hunger satisfact-o-meter.
There are times I eat a huge me and an hour later I could eat again. I
tracked my calories on Monday. I ate a little over 4,000 calories yet was
still hungry at the end of the day. That just doesn't seem normal to me.