Nope, mine is the original turner plus 3 which is the best sounding one of
the series. Eats batteries, but sounds good while doing it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
> hmmm. is yours the plus 3b?
> ah. yes I remember now. the hand mics were the road king and the m plus
> 3. I use to own an m plus 3. the desk mics were the plus 3b and the
> super side kick. I always loved the audio of the super side kick.
>
> Shaun
> web sites:
> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
> skype: brailledude
>
>
> On 21/03/2008 12:49 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>> that's not a hand mic, it's a desk mic.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:42 AM
>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>
>>
>>> hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
>>> that would be a rather ballsy sound.
>>> I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a
>>> yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham
>>> license but god that radio use to sound nice..
>>> he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on
>>> the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and
>>> you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.
>>>
>>> Shaun
>>> web sites:
>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>> skype: brailledude
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on
>>>> 10
>>>> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be,
>>>> I'm
>>>> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I
>>>> get
>>>> great reports so far.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>>>>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>>>>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that
>>>>> era,
>>>>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>>>>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shaun
>>>>> web sites:
>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able
>>>>> to
>>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>>>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power
>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly,
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>
>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
|
