Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:32:51 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, that is true. Ron Paul does not follow a palaeolithic diet nor does he endorse it, specifically. However, his stance on the cutting off of all grains-subsidies is something which, indirectly, will be of great help to the palaeolithic diet community since it will mean getting more sources of locally-raised grassfed meat in the US. On top of this, his libertarian stance will, in general, mean people having more individual liberty as regards access to their desired food-sources. This is particularly relevant to the raw, palaeolithic diet community as government authorities have, on numerous occasions, hysterically tried to crack down on sales of raw foods(such as the shameful, attempted government crackdown on the sale of raw oysters in Florida a while back). It's no surprise that Ron Paul is also in favour of legalising raw dairy sales, given his background and past integrity. But even cooked-palaeolithic-dieters will benefit from more of such libertarianism.
Geoff
|
|
|