Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:20:38 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 11/29/2011 5:33 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> I don't like Paris. But then again, I've only seen a photograph or two.
>
> Read the book.
>
> Jim
Point taken. Perhaps what I should have said was, I've read the table
of contents, a couple of excerpts, and summaries written by others, and
I see nothing new or different enough to make me want to read the whole
thing. The table of contents gives a pretty good idea what his
arguments are. I've heard them before, and not been impressed. But
if I get the chance, I'll read it.
> Quoting Robert Kesterson <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> On 11/29/2011 7:04 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>> Agreed, but many hold the view. Which is why I humbly suggest
>>> reading this fantastic book.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> I haven't read the entire book, just sample excerpts from Amazon and
>> Barnes & Noble, but what I've seen so far hasn't given me any reason
>> to change my position.
>>
>> Religion is a funny thing. People don't truly question their own
>> beliefs, as much as look to justify them. (I speak from experience
>> -- I've been everywhere on the spectrum from devout to atheistic.
>> Questioning your own beliefs is not an easy thing.)
>>
>> --
>> Robert Kesterson
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
--
--
Robert Kesterson
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|