Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:51:45 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:37:04 +0100, Dedy Rundle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I'm with you on that one Andrea... they would be aesthetically more pleasing
>too!
>
>If 'brain-tanned' they would not lose their suppleness when wet either.
>
>Dedy
Yes, they would be nice, though brain-tanned moccasins tend to be much more
expensive than the other shoes mentioned so far. I have a pair of moccasins,
but they are a lower-quality, much cheaper type.
I definitely think that flexible, heel-less shoes of some sort are
worthwhile. Individual needs and budget determine which ones someone should
get.
The imitator shoes so far tend to be moccasin- or slipper-type shoes. I
don't know much about the quality, but imitators tend to be lower quality
than originators (though not always).
|
|
|