Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:39:47 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Angel,
I transferred this over to echurch since I promised to no longer comment on
the topic on blind-x but I did want to answer you.
I thought of you recently as I did some Harold Potter research and ran
across some Catholics who not only wrote reviews on the Harold Potter series
of books but had been previously involved in the occult. I can look it up
again and post their comments on echurch if you like. They found a ton of
occult symbolism throughout all the Harold Potter books but if you aren't
interested, I won't bother digging the article up. You likely wouldn't
agree with them anyway.
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Harry Potter & the blind man.
> I know this because we have all been exposed to horrific fiction. Mother
> Goose, the brother's grim fairy tales are two examples of violence in
> fiction. We all either read or heard those tales and didn't suffer from
> them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Harry Potter & the blind man.
>
>
> > How can you know that, Angel, if you haven't read them. See your
remarks
> > below. Also, since when do we have license to screw around with
children
> > to
> > see if they can take something or not? 100 percent of the people I work
> > with daily were emotionally damaged, and some physically damaged, as
> > children and some were very small children.
> >
> > Phil.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Angel" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: Harry Potter & the blind man.
> >
> >
> >> This is why I told Phil on another list, one can not discuss a book or
> >> series of books unless one has read that book or series of books
> >> intelligently. I have not read those books, neither would I attempt to
> >> discuss them with those who have. They are just children's fiction.
> >> Children are more resilient and knowledgeable than we give them credit
> >> for
> >> being.
>
|
|
|