BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shaun Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Mar 2008 12:19:04 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (119 lines)
and the best part, they weren't even an active mic


On 2/03/2008 9:39 AM, the old scribe known as Louis Kim Kline was able 
to impart this pearl of wisdom:
> I am pretty sure it is a lot higher impedance than that.  It works well on 
> the Ten Tec rigs that were made in the 70s and 80s because they all wanted 
> to see impedances of around 50 kilohms.  I still have one on my Ten Tec 
> Argonaut 509.
> 
> 73, de Lou K2LKK
> 
> 
> 
> At 03:13 PM 3/1/2008 -0700, you wrote:
>> they're pretty cheap on ebay, even for the golden eagle model.
>> Lots of guys use those estatic D104's on the older gear, and even on some of
>> the newer gear they sound great.
>> Unfortunately, for any of the newer stuff, they have to be modified to match
>> up the impedance to the mike input.
>> Most new rigs want a 600Ohm mike input, and i think the d104 is probably
>> around 2K or 2.5K ohms.
>> I had a silver eagle at one point, and I should never have traded it.
>> 73
>> Colin, V A6BKX
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 8:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: TS-120
>>
>>
>>> I'll tell you what would be nice, one of them d-104 lollypop mics I love
>>> the sound of them things. esp on the old tram d-201
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/03/2008 8:28 PM, the old scribe known as Lou Kline was able to
>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I'm assuming that the TS120S was pretty much the same as the
>>>> TS130S.  Basically, with the Kenwood MC50 microphone it was pretty
>> decent,
>>>> and it didn't do too badly with the Shure 444 or the 444D.  It had
>>>> decidedly less punch with the Turner hand mic that I had (Turner 355C),
>> and
>>>> with a Shure 526T it sounded like crap.
>>>>
>>>> Probably more than you wanted to know.
>>>>
>>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At 01:57 PM 3/1/2008 +1100, you wrote:
>>>>> hahahaha. the radios I blew the bum outa were on air at the time. I was
>>>>> making some adjustments and I needed an ear a fair way away to inform
>> me
>>>>> of any changes in the audio and well you get the idea.
>>>>> oh well, while I'm on it, what do people think about the tx audio of
>> the
>>>>> old 120s, from what I remember of the things, they had some grunt even
>>>>> without any kind of compression or processing. even the 120v had some
>> balls.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1305 - Release Date:
>> 2/29/2008
>>>>> 6:32 PM
>>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>>> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>>> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>>>> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ NOD32 2913 (20080301) Information __________
>>>>
>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1305 - Release Date: 2/29/2008
>> 6:32 PM
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1305 - Release Date: 2/29/2008 
>> 6:32 PM
> 
> Louis Kim Kline
> A.R.S. K2LKK
> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 2913 (20080301) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2