BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:17:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Hi;
it was the icv8.  The buttons didn't feel very user friendly and it 
certainly was larger than the ict90 which may mean it had a longer lasting 
battery.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: thf6a


the THf6A and ICT90A are just about the same size. I think the 7 watt one
was either the ICv8A or the ICt7A both discontinued.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: thf6a


> Hi;
> Since I am limited to a hand held until warmer weather I'm curious to know
> how much larger the kenwood thf6a is than my ict90.  I truly love the cw
> readout but I am finding I can hear lots of repeaters and hit few probably
> because of transmit power.
> Also, a friend was using a handheld that was rated at 7 wats but
> unfortunately I can't remember the model number.
> Richard
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2