i guess they have to get their ideas from somewhere ;p

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: 440


> just watch 24 to get a really thorough understanding of how NSA and home
> land security operates....its sad, but sometimes it seems that they don't 
> do
> anything different then what the holliwood producers come up with.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: 440
>
>
>> nLou, there's a homeland security deal that let's them close the band
> where they
>> think is appripriate.  I'm in central Texas and we've seen some
> alterations in
>> the area.  My guess would be in the Washington dc area and along the
> Canada line
>> and perhaps along the Mexico border and even perhaps the eastern air
> coridor
>> might be prime spots.  I understand there have also been some changes in
> New
>> Mexico.  Apparently these can be made at any time someone decides it is
>> appropriate.  I believe they can also apply to 2 meters.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Lou Kline wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:01:06 -0500
>> > From: Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: 440
>> >
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > I think this is just a regional issue in California and Massachusetts.
> I
>> > haven't heard anything about closing down the band elsewhere.
>> >
>> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > At 11:13 AM 12/30/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>> > >I hope not.
>> > >
>> > >I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
>> > >
>> > >73 De Anthony W2AJV
>> > >[log in to unmask]
>> > >ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>> > >
>> > >----- Original Message -----
>> > >From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > >Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
>> > >Subject: 440
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my 
>> > > > =
>
>> > > > radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it
> sure =
>> > > > makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut
> =
>> > > > down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to
> 440?=20
>> > > >
>> > > > from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >--
>> > >No virus found in this incoming message.
>> > >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> > >Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date:
> 1/1/2008
>> > >12:09 PM
>> >
>> > Louis Kim Kline
>> > A.R.S. K2LKK
>> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date: 
>> 1/1/2008
> 12:09 PM
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date: 1/1/2008 
> 12:09 PM
>