BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 440
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:13:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
I hope not.

I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
Subject: 440


> Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my =
> radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it sure =
> makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut =
> down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to 440?=20
> 
> from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band. 
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2