Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Saturated Fat, was Floridation
From:
L <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:40:30 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I think Anthony Colpo probably has some good counterarguments for most anit 
sat fat studies in his book "The Great Cholesterol Con" which I don't have 
to hand.


Leonie


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paleo Phil"

These seem to be the best of the anti-saturated-fat studies (there are
others that contradict these, such as the Stanford Atkins-Ornish study and
the Framingham study). I was hoping that Todd or someone might have good
counterarguments to or criticisms of these, as I couldn't find any online.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV