Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:01:55 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and
ignored. |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Pauling's view has it's paleo component as well. His research on formation
>and removal of arterial plaque led him to believe early man in the tropics
>had sufficient dietary vitamin C,
The presumption being that lack of vitamin C is the "cause" of arterial plaque?
Paulings "allopathic" use of supplements, while fascinating, is putting the cart before the horse - in my opinion. While potentially therapeutic, it never addresses the problem - i.e the Paleo view that the problem is caused by eating the wrong kinds of foods, not because of some sort of rampant vitamin C deficiency.
When I was (much) younger, and researching many of the dietary philosophies of the 70's, I read many of Pauling's books and papers. I could never get over the fact that in order to get his recommended vitamin C intake (upwards of 10 grams per day), you'd pretty much have to be a fruitarian. Or, eat a boatload of liver.
Unfortunately, many scientists treat this kind of research as though primitive man had a pharmacy in the cave next door.
|
|
|