Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:09:44 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<op.uvbc6fc1wc4mme@titan> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Robert Kesterson wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:37:28 -0500, Geoffrey Purcell
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, the point Wrangham makes re raw foodists mostly losing weight is
>> reasonably true, ...
>> There've been a couple of theories put forward re this phenomenon:-
>> either that eating cooked-food leads to greater water-retention in
>> the body, thus resulting in larger weight; or that the body tends to
>> store the toxins from cooked-foods in the fat-cells, thus resulting
>> in bigger bellies etc.
>
> It could also be that before taking on the raw food approach, people
> just ate too much (at least in terms of calories). Raw foods, by
> their very nature, are primarily meat and veggies, and it's pretty
> hard to overeat on raw meat and veggies.
>
Umm...or the complete lack of grains in a raw diet and (most) legumes
and such.
|
|
|