In a message dated 5/3/99 7:10:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> State budgetary restrictions were not a defense, the appeals court said,
>  unless the cost of compliance was "so unreasonable given the demands of the
>  state's mental health budget that it would fundamentally alter the service
>  it provides."
if we can afford to bomb the serbs, we can surely afford to fund community
based group homes and other solutions.  it's just a matter of Will.

mag