Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:31:52 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
bobby,
A friend of mine was hoodwinked into sending the same thing to me... I
thought it was a hoax, and sure enough it was...
> Subject: Email hoax
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:15:17 -0500
> From: Charli J Seitz <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask],
> [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
> I checked this out and found this message on the Washingtonian web site.
> Sorry to alarm anyone! Love ya'll---Charli
>
>
> The message that is apparently out over the Internet about an
> "editorial" by The Washingtonian supporting an e-mail tax is
> a
> hoax.
>
> We never wrote such an article or editorial. We do not have a
> "March 6" issue. The congressman quoted does not exist; the
> bill
> number does not exist; the law firm which supposedly wrote
> this
> e-mail does not exist; the address given for the law firm
> does not
> exist; and an almost identical e-mail was started a month
> beforehand claiming that the Canadian government was going to
> impose an e-mail tax.
>
> We at The Washingtonian do not know who put this hoax out,
> but it is not true.
>
> --The Washingtonian
>
Bobby Greer wrote:
>
> List members,
>
> In case you have not heard of this bill, take a look at what the greedy
> Postal Service is trying to do!!!
>
> Bobby
>
> Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online > continue using email:
|
|
|