BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:52:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Hi.

I think this stuff is pretty short range so it probably doesn't impact 
maritime users at all.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 10:46 PM 11/4/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>What has moved to 216 so far?  That is really an odd band for them to move
>to, and what about the maritime users?
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> > Don, the systems that I set up or do fittings for seem to still 
> indicate to me
> > that large systems such as churches are in that 72-77 mHz range but the 
> personal
> > stuff is moving up to the 216 band.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.21/1109 - Release Date: 
>11/4/2007 11:05 AM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2