BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 216-220 useage in the U.S.
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 22:46:45 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (20 lines) 
What has moved to 216 so far?  That is really an odd band for them to move
to, and what about the maritime users?





On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Don, the systems that I set up or do fittings for seem to still indicate to me
> that large systems such as churches are in that 72-77 mHz range but the personal
> stuff is moving up to the 216 band.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2