BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:04:11 -0000
Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="windows-1250"
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
GPSC
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Tom:
It does show high SWR on some bands.
Also consider that it was designed for use with its specific L/C network,
and that it also was designed for use with old gear using what we call over
here 'valves' and you call 'tubes'!
Which tank circuits were more forgiving.

David



-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of T Behler
Sent: 28 December 2007 03:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: more G5RV stuff

    So, John, you're saying that I should feel safe in using the antenna, so

long as I tune it with the rig's auto-tuner?

What do the others think?

I know the G5RV is a compromise antenna at best, so maybe the high-sounding 
SWR readings aren't a problem, as long at the auto-tuner can still make the 
radio happy. Am I correct here?

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: more G5RV stuff


> Mine isn't much better, I'd say that's pretty typical.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:09 PM
> Subject: more G5RV stuff
>
>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> Can someone tell me what an acceptable SWR picture would be for a 
>> 102-foot
>> G5RV antenna?
>>
>> I re-oriented my G5RV antenna today, by making the ladder-line run pretty
>> much vertically from the antenna feed-point at the top of my 35-foot
>> tower,
>> to the coax that then goes into my shack from the base of the tower.  I
>> checked the connections between the ladder-line and the coax feedline, 
>> and
>> they still seem to be good.
>>
>> My SWR's are a bit better, and the auto-tuners on both my IC746 and
>> Kenwood
>> TS480 now tune the antenna on 40 meters (which I couldn't say before), 
>> but
>> the SWR's still seem quite high to me.
>>
>> On 40 meters, I get an SWR anywhere from about 5 to 1 down to about 4 to
>> 1.
>>
>> The antenna has its best SWR readings on 20 meters, which you'd expect,
>> but
>> even here, I can't get the SWR to go much below about 1.8 to 1 in the
>> center
>> of the band.
>>
>> Again, at least now, the auto-tuners in both of my HF rigs will tune the
>> antenna, but I'm wondering whether it's even safe or wise to use the
>> antenna
>> under these conditions.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>
>
> 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.11/1200 - Release Date: 27/12/2007
13:34
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.11/1200 - Release Date: 27/12/2007
13:34
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2