Yeah, there is science in either way, yep.  And I don't much hold things in my brain with "science", but since you guys are going with this, whatever.  How many times has science been proven WRONG?????




>Archaeologist hate this stuff (forbidden knowledge!), 

In your mind, maybe. Archeologists, pretty much by definition, LOVE puzzles.. 

>of it:http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/ancientman/04_cup.html
>http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/13anc03.htm
>http://s8int.com/page8.html

Ah yes. Thanks for reminding me of these sites. I've visited them numerous times, and explored their arguments. When you get past the more flippant comments, some of their anti-evolution evidence is intriguing. Almost all of it (as far as I can recall) has also been addressed - scientifically - by real scientists -  at the TalkOrigins.org site. 

>And the book "Human Devolution" by Michael A. Cremo subtitled A Vedic
>Alternative to Darwin's Theory.

Have not read it. Sounds interesting.