Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:00:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Gary.
It depends upon what you call "better." Generally, the software that is
written for a specific radio works more tightly with that radio. By that I
mean that the software will control more aspects of the radio's
functionality than a one size fits all package that will control the
aspects of the radio that are common to most radios.
Besides that, my experience with other Kenwood software suggests that it is
probably easier to use with a screen reader than Ham Radio Deluxe is. You
can use HRD if you are comfortable with working with the JAWS cursor or the
Window-Eyes Mouse Cursor, but I like it easy. I will generally take the
path of least resistance. I'd like to spend my time making QSOs, not
fiddling with software.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 03:47 PM 11/24/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>Was reading about the TS480SAT and it mentioned about using the Kenwood
>ARCP480 software to control the radio, Isn't Ham Radio deluxe a better
>program to use? Doesn't the Ham Radio deluxe control more than one type of
>radios?
>Gary KB2YAA
>"Failure is not an option"
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.6/1150 - Release Date:
>11/24/2007 5:58 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|