********************************************************
VISIT AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON WEBSITE
http://www.africanassociation.org
FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON AFRICA FEST 2009,
MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITY CALENDAR AND MUCH MORE....
********************************************************
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23552212-details/London+NHS+care+is+postcode+lottery/article.do
London NHS care is postcode lottery
Sophie Goodchild
08.09.08
Patients in London face a postcode lottery on how much health bosses spend on urgent care, a report reveals today.
Research by The Kings Fund shows wide variations in health trusts' spending priorities for cancer, heart disease, life-threatening injuries and mental health.
Some London primary care trusts spend the lowest amount per patient in the country.
A league table shows Ealing comes bottom in England for cancer spending at £47 per patient. This compares with the highest spender, Redbridge, which allocates about £89 per patient.
The trust also allocates more per patient than any other London trust for heart disease - £132 per head.
Bottom of the league are Haringey and Southwark which allocates just £76 for cardiac treatment.
Barnet Primary Care Trust tops the league for injury and trauma care with a spend of £81 per patient - nearly five times as much as Lewisham which comes bottom in London.
Islington spends £332 per head of population on mental health - the highest anywhere in the country. Health campaignerswarned that patients are being condemned to a "death sentence" by trusts that spend the least on care.
Geoff Martin from pressure group Health Emergency said: 'We've been promised so many times that this postcode lottery would end. But these figures show huge gaps between quality of care. What it means is that people are being condemned to death because of spending."
The five capital primary care trusts which spend the least per cancer patient are Ealing, Westminster, Kingston, Kensington and Chelsea and Southwark. The five highest spending are Redbridge, Sutton and Merton, Hounslow, Havering and Bromley.
******************************
"In the days before volcanoes were invented, lava had to be hand carried down from the mountains and poured on the sleeping villagers.
This took a great deal of time."
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Gramling <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:21 am
Subject: Re: Secret wait for cancer patients
To: [log in to unmask]
> ********************************************************
>
> VISIT AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON WEBSITE
>
> http://www.africanassociation.org
>
> FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON AFRICA FEST 2009,
>
> MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITY CALENDAR AND MUCH MORE....
>
> ********************************************************
>
> Vera,
>
> The question also is 'What limits are placed on such care?'
>
> Jon Gramling
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: African Association of Madison [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of VERA R CROWELL
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:57 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Secret wait for cancer patients
>
> ********************************************************
>
> VISIT AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON WEBSITE
>
> http://www.africanassociation.org
>
> FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON AFRICA FEST 2009,
>
> MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITY CALENDAR AND MUCH MORE....
>
> ********************************************************
>
> John,
>
> The real question is not "how long the "secret" wait is for people
> with no
> access to health care." In many states, the people with no health insurance
> through work or who are low-income have access to programs like Wisconsin's
> BadgerCare. If the state chooses not to fund such a program, then those
> people in that state are without options. The real question is why
> don't all
> states offer such programs to low income and the under-insured?
>
> I posted that article because people seem to believe that national health
> care will solve all health care issues and people without insurance will
> magically be covered and everything will be fine. That is not the case.
> Everyone's health care costs will go up and the care we receive will be
> rationed. What is now covered will not be covered because cost-effectiveness
> is the #1 priority in national health care. If you are old, fewer health
> care resources will be expended on you than are expended on the young.
> Also,
> if your illness is caused by your own actions, fewer health care resources
> will be expended on you.
>
> ******************************
> "In the days before volcanoes were invented, lava had to be hand carried
> down from the mountains and poured on the sleeping villagers.
> This took a great deal of time."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Stafford Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:58 am
> Subject: Re: Secret wait for cancer patients
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
> > ********************************************************
> >
> > VISIT AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON WEBSITE
> >
> > http://www.africanassociation.org
> >
> > FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON AFRICA FEST 2009,
> >
> > MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITY CALENDAR AND MUCH MORE....
> >
> > ********************************************************
> >
> > Wonder how long the "secret" wait is for people with no access to
> > health care?
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Jul 13, 2009, at 8:46 AM, VERA R CROWELL wrote:
> >
> > > ********************************************************
> > >
> > > VISIT AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF MADISON WEBSITE
> > >
> > > http://www.africanassociation.org
> > >
> > > FOR LATEST INFORMATION ON AFRICA FEST 2009,
> > >
> > > MEMBERSHIP, COMMUNITY CALENDAR AND MUCH MORE....
> > >
> > > ********************************************************
> > >
> > > More good news on National Health Services!
> > >
> > >
> http://www.scotsman.com/latestnews/Secret-wait-for-cancer-patients.5451457.j
> p
> > >
> > > Secret wait for cancer patients
> > > Published Date: 12 July 2009
> > > By Eddie Barnes
> > > CANCER patients are still waiting as long as a year to get life-
> > > saving hospital treatment, despite ministers' claims waiting time
>
> > > targets are being met.
> > > Scotland on Sunday has obtained official hospital by hospital
> data,
> >
> > > unpublished by the Scottish Government, which shows that for
> certain
> >
> > > types of cancer, patients in some units are waiting an average of
>
> > > 100 days before getting treated.
> > >
> > > In the most extreme case, an Edinburgh patient with urological
> > > cancer - likely kidney, testicular or prostate - had to wait 375
>
> > > days after first seeing the GP before getting treatment.
> > >
> > > In May, Scottish ministers revealed that they had met a target to
>
> > > ensure all "urgent" cancer cases were seen within 62 days.
> However,
> >
> > > the figure does not include the thousands of so-called
> "non-urgent"
> >
> > > cases - classified as such because GPs have not flagged up cancer
> as
> >
> > > a possible cause of their illness.
> > >
> > > In total, some 27,000 patients are diagnosed with cancer in
> Scotland
> >
> > > ever year. But only 9,500 of them were classified as "urgent" by GPs.
> > >
> > > ******************************
> > > "In the days before volcanoes were invented, lava had to be hand
>
> > > carried down from the mountains and poured on the sleeping villagers.
> > > This took a great deal of time."
> > >
> > > *** Send email to the list: [log in to unmask] ***
> > > *** Access AAM list archives:
> > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/AAM.html
> > > ***
> >
> > *** Send email to the list: [log in to unmask] ***
> > *** Access AAM list archives:
> > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/AAM.html ***
>
> *** Send email to the list: [log in to unmask] ***
> *** Access AAM list archives: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/AAM.html
> ***
>
> *** Send email to the list: [log in to unmask] ***
> *** Access AAM list archives:
> http://listserv.icors.org/archives/AAM.html ***
*** Send email to the list: [log in to unmask] ***
*** Access AAM list archives: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/AAM.html ***
|
