Hahahah - one more thing to thank greedy corporate CEO's for - 
Sarbanes-Oxley.  Actually I think it's all good, just a lot of work to 
be in compliance. It certainly is necessary after the greediness over at 
Enron.

I understand your point re: the climate discussion but you do have to 
admit we here on this list do wander all over the place once a 
discussion starts!

Now I'm really really off to bed!

Kat

ken barber wrote:
> oh, good luck with your auditors. i always enjoyed
> auditors.  NOT!!! LUCKILY I DO NOT THINK THEY
> REPRODUCE. 
>
> --- kat <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>   
>> My dear Ken,
>>
>> (1) All talk of Bush leads back to Iraq, it would
>> seem.  It's the 
>> ignition point over which just about everyone sets
>> on when talking about 
>> the man.
>>
>> (2) Even if you sat two scientists in the same room,
>> you wouldn't get 
>> them to agree on everything within their discipline,
>> let alone a 
>> thousand scientists on global issues such as climate
>> change and 
>> epidemiology.  That's the very nature of science -
>> taking observations 
>> and deriving conclusions from them - human nature
>> being what it is, no 
>> one is going to agree with everyone else on anything
>> - there will always 
>> be dissenters.
>>
>> I'm off to bed - I have a fun meeting with SOX
>> auditors to look forward 
>> to tomorrow.  Good luck in packing up your stuff.
>>
>> Kat
>>
>>
>> ken barber wrote:
>>     
>>> we started with global warming and what i saw as
>>>       
>> lack
>>     
>>> of agreement between scientist and we get BUSH AND
>>> IRAG. I CONCEDE THAT MOST OF YOU DON'T LIKE BUSH. 
>>> sorry about the caps lock. 
>>> i guess no matter what, Bush and Irag is the
>>>       
>> answer
>>     
>>> that is brought forth.  
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Bush has hocked our future with his war for oil
>>>>         
>> and
>>     
>>>> maimed and killed 
>>>> both Americans and Iraquis in huge numbers. 
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>  At 01:47 PM 9/12/2007, you wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>> well about 500 experts are saying "no."
>>>>>
>>>>> --- Peter Hunsberger
>>>>>           
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>     
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On 9/12/07, ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>> wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>>> first article references 2nd and others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/11/avery-and-singer-unstoppable-hot-air/
>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>>> http://www.ncpa.org/pub/st/st279/st279a.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Since the first link points out the falicies in
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>> the
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>> "global warming is
>>>>>> not man made" argument a better subject line
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>> might
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>> be "man-made global
>>>>>> warming? the experts say yes one more time"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Peter Hunsberger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----------------------
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>> -----------------------
>>     

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy