Ken, I am sorry to hear of the hearing's results. I know these are
bureaucrats and not law courts but I think you can say the same of
SSDB adjudications. If you keep appealing to the end of the process,
I'm sure you will win in the end - hang in there, mate.
Kat
On 3 May 2006, at 19:24, ken barber wrote:
The hearing decision was just a rehash of what had
been done and affirming> the first opinion. Nothing
was said of all the doctors opinions we gave them. It
was like nothing new was added at the hearing. I
really do not know> why it took 75 days for this. She
apparently did not look at anything new.
She could have typed this the next day.
basically i can't get a real hearing because i have
cp and they can't concive that i could be injured
further. i think most of you understand this.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy