Hi.
If the pin-out on the mic matches the pin-out on the radio, I don't think
you'll have any problem with the Yaesu mic. As I commented in my previous
post, the only mic that did really poorly was the Shure 526T and the reason
was because I couldn't keep RF out of the preamp on that mic, and the
TS130S didn't really need the preamp anyway.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 02:57 PM 3/1/2008 +1100, you wrote:
>hahahaha. gotta get the 120 yet, so might even be able to swing an mc50
>as part of the package. have to do me some careful looking.
>it's a pity them old rigs didn't have any speech processing or
>compression feature. what I remember of the older kenwoods, the speech
>processor was second to none. and with the mc50 driving it, it was just
>that much better. I do have a Yaesu YD-148 which I got for nothing and
>it still works. so if all else fails, I'll use that. it has a nice sound
>and a flexable gooseneck, and the head looks like a golf ball. maybe
>that will drive the radio just nicely.
>
>
>On 1/03/2008 2:40 PM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>impart this pearl of wisdom:
> > 1 thing I learned, cables and mics, you never get rid of because when you
> > need them again, you can't find them anywhere for a reasonable price if at
> > all. I've been looking for a reasonable Icom SM-8 since I got my current
> > IC-706 3 years ago or so, maybe 4 years ago now, anyway, I can't find them
> > for anywhere near what I paid for my first one and the prices I see them
> > for, when I do see them, I wouldn't pay for it quite honestly. I should
> have
> > kept the first one.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: TS-120
> >
> >
> >> I'm gonna try get an mc50 to go with the 120 as I like them old mics.
> >> even the squeaky key noise. I use to love sitting there on cb bands and
> >> keying down ever so slowly just to give people the tom tits with my 100
> >> watts of squeaky mc50 key.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/03/2008 2:05 PM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
> >> impart this pearl of wisdom:
> >>> With the MC-50, all those older radios sounded great. 520, 120, 130, I
> >>> think
> >>> 140 was 4 pin, 530, 820, 830, and any I missed with the 4 pin connector.
> >>> The hand mics don't impress me, the the MC-50 does and the commercial
> mic
> >>> I
> >>> have I got with my TS-520 isn't too bad either, or the other similar
> >>> mics.
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:57 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: TS-120
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> hahahaha. the radios I blew the bum outa were on air at the time. I was
> >>>> making some adjustments and I needed an ear a fair way away to inform me
> >>>> of any changes in the audio and well you get the idea.
> >>>> oh well, while I'm on it, what do people think about the tx audio of the
> >>>> old 120s, from what I remember of the things, they had some grunt even
> >>>> without any kind of compression or processing. even the 120v had some
> >>>> balls.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> __________ NOD32 2912 (20080229) Information __________
> >>>
> >>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >>> http://www.eset.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > __________ NOD32 2912 (20080229) Information __________
> >
> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1305 - Release Date: 2/29/2008
>6:32 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
