BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:25:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
No, that meant it has an NiCad or NIMH battery that didn't last as long as 
the T90A.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: thf6a


> Hi;
> it was the icv8.  The buttons didn't feel very user friendly and it
> certainly was larger than the ict90 which may mean it had a longer lasting
> battery.
> Richard
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 3:23 PM
> Subject: Re: thf6a
>
>
> the THf6A and ICT90A are just about the same size. I think the 7 watt one
> was either the ICv8A or the ICt7A both discontinued.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:11 PM
> Subject: thf6a
>
>
>> Hi;
>> Since I am limited to a hand held until warmer weather I'm curious to 
>> know
>> how much larger the kenwood thf6a is than my ict90.  I truly love the cw
>> readout but I am finding I can hear lots of repeaters and hit few 
>> probably
>> because of transmit power.
>> Also, a friend was using a handheld that was rated at 7 wats but
>> unfortunately I can't remember the model number.
>> Richard
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2