Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:12:02 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It's only being cut back majorly in some areas, not everywhere. Mine happens
to be 1 of those areas but repeaters way up top of the band shouldn't be
effected, and I'm not sure how low in the band but I think if they wanted to
rework the band with repeaters down in the 430s, they could do that as long
as it was down low. I'm not sure on that but I think so but the band isn't
going completely away. Not yet anyway.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: 440
>I hope not.
>
> I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
> Subject: 440
>
>
>> Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my =
>> radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it sure =
>> makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut =
>> down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to 440?=20
>>
>> from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
>>
>>
>
|
|
|