BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
don bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
don bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:48:41 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
These personal assistive systems use small fm transmitters with a 
range of only a few hundred feet, so interferrence with other 
services is most unlikely if it exists at all.

Don


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: 216-220 useage in the U.S.


> What has moved to 216 so far?  That is really an odd band for them 
> to move
> to, and what about the maritime users?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>> Don, the systems that I set up or do fittings for seem to still 
>> indicate to me
>> that large systems such as churches are in that 72-77 mHz range 
>> but the personal
>> stuff is moving up to the 216 band.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>
>
> __________ NOD32 2636 (20071103) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2