BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:07:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
I get nothing in that range around here last I looked which was a while ago 
but there really is not much equipment for that anymore so I'd be shocked if 
I did hear anything around there.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: 216-220 useage in the U.S.


> Well, I don't know the closest you'd get with the F6 is the 222-225 range,
> but even where I'm from around the great lakes I never hear anything htere
> other then occasional data.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, John Miller wrote:
>
>> That could be the case but I'd sure like to know where to find equipment 
>> for
>> it these days.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:59 PM
>> Subject: 216-220 useage in the U.S.
>>
>>
>> > Hi everyone, I just checked www.dxing.com and the 216-220 band is used 
>> > for
>> > maritime, and 219-220 there was something said about use of digital
>> > messages for hams, but I don't think this is true. any more.
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2