BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:10:49 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)
Well, I don't know the closest you'd get with the F6 is the 222-225 range,
but even where I'm from around the great lakes I never hear anything htere
other then occasional data.





On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, John Miller wrote:

> That could be the case but I'd sure like to know where to find equipment for
> it these days.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:59 PM
> Subject: 216-220 useage in the U.S.
>
>
> > Hi everyone, I just checked www.dxing.com and the 216-220 band is used for
> > maritime, and 219-220 there was something said about use of digital
> > messages for hams, but I don't think this is true. any more.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2