Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:51:06 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think you are probably better off without the pigtail adaptor. One more
source of voltage drop. You're probably just better off to use the correct
cord in the first place. I know what you mean though. If you have a
Kenwood supply from an older rig, it would be nice to just buy the rig and
use the same old supply. Or, use the same supply for both the Kenwood
TS2000S and the TS480S if you have the situation that Kevin does. It does
make you wonder what Kenwood was thinking.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 03:10 PM 10/20/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>I think you can use a standard shielded network cable for a mike
>extension. Worse case, you might have to put a choke on it. I've read of
>other folks using cat five extensions for this with no problems.
>I really would never consider the 200 watt version, takes more power, only
>gains you 3 db, and one more thing to go wrong. The only real complaint I
>have with this radio is Kenwood went to a smaller power connecter, so old
>power cords won't work. I wish someone made a pig tail adapter for this.
>73s
>Butch Bussen
>wa0vjr
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1084 - Release Date:
>10/21/2007 3:09 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|