BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:51:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
I think you are probably better off without the pigtail adaptor.  One more 
source of voltage drop.  You're probably just better off to use the correct 
cord in the first place.  I know what you mean though.  If you have a 
Kenwood supply from an older rig, it would be nice to just buy the rig and 
use the same old supply.  Or, use the same supply for both the Kenwood 
TS2000S and the TS480S if you have the situation that Kevin does.  It does 
make you wonder what Kenwood was thinking.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 03:10 PM 10/20/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>I think you can use a standard shielded network cable for a mike
>extension.  Worse case, you might have to put a choke on it.  I've read of
>other folks using cat five extensions for this with no problems.
>I really would never consider the 200 watt version, takes more power, only
>gains you 3 db, and one more thing to go wrong.  The only real complaint I
>have with this radio is Kenwood went to a smaller power connecter, so old
>power cords won't work.  I wish someone made a pig tail adapter for this.
>73s
>Butch Bussen
>wa0vjr
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1084 - Release Date: 
>10/21/2007 3:09 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2