I don't know about impedence, but I've used turner mikes on older and
newer tranceivers for years. Turners were made for solid state cb rigs.
They sound great. D 104 without a preamp, yes, you're right, they are
high impedence. Even those with the built in preamp work fine.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
On Wed, 4
Jul 2007, Pat Byrne wrote:
> Those mikes are the wrong impedance for the transceiver. Not an
> uncommon problem.At 09:01 AM 7/4/2007, you wrote:
>> Incidentally the radio won't take any mike I hook to it. I have a few turner
>> mikes, some old estatic mikes that aren't made anymore, and the old school
>> silver eagle. The icom didn't like any of those. That's asahame since I miss
>> using those mikes.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>
>>
>> Oh yeah, if the SM-8 won't drive it it must be out of adjustment, that's a
>> normally hard driving mic. Not an overly bad radio but I'd be careful
>> getting it fixed, I see those sold all the time for under $400 in great
>> shape. It might not be worth a lot to fix it though just putting it back in
>> adjustment probably won't be too bad for you.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>
>>
>>> Since this guy's talking about the 735 I'm glad in a way. I can't find too
>>> many friends that use it. Mine needs some real readjusting. I bought it
>>> from
>>> a guy who used it for cb. He told me the radio was good. He said I'm
>>> paying
>>> a lot less than he paid for it. I got it for 200 dollars. Then a sighted
>>> friend help me hook it to ham deluxe so I can program it with jaws.
>>> Actually, it uses Microsoft marry. I found out way later that my radio was
>>> past around from one cb person to another and they butchered it. The audio
>>> on it for a m sucks. The microphone for it, the f m 8 hardly puts out any
>>> audio. I know that's not normal. I'll keep the radio because it is still
>>> useable, but I'm very disappointed at having to take it in to have it
>>> looked
>>> at one day. That's gonna cost me and I'm not happy about that.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:17 AM
>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> The Icom 735 came out after the 751A and used the AT150 auto tuner from
>>> Icom. I found that with the antennas that I have, the AT200 Pro was only
>>> slightly better than the AT180, but since I already had the AT180 when LDG
>>> introduced the AT200 Pro, and since I never had the interface for the Icom
>>> (I used it for a short time on the TS2000S), I still have the AT180. It
>>> does seem like Icom's prices on their auto tuners is rather excessive
>>> though, but then, one could say that about most accessories from Icom.
>>>
>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 09:36 PM 7/3/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>>> I actually think the LDG is better than the 180, as do many, which is why
>>>> I
>>>> never bought the at180. I know the 735 has that hookup in the back, not
>>> sure
>>>> what year that is, but the 761 icom, I don't recall seeing it on that
>>>> radio
>>>> in the local EOC though it might have just been missed.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:31 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect that it might pre-date that as that was a 1980's radio. But,
>>>>> that was what I was alluding to in my last message.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure when Icom started doing that, but I know that both my
>>> TS690S
>>>>> and my TS2000S will support the Kenwood interface. I never bought the
>>>>> Icom
>>>>> interface for the MFJ because I always found the Icom AT180 to be
>>>>> sufficient. Of course, it should be for what Icom asks for those
>>> kiddos.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At 05:15 PM 7/3/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>>> I'd wonder if you can get a cable like the one for the 706 where you
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> hook it right to the radio, that's slick but I don't know if your radio
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> the tuner hookup on the back.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:58 PM
>>>>>> Subject: tuner
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I got the tuner in. I was surprised that it didn't come with an ac
>>>>>>> adaptor like the tw-01 watt meter. I'll get someone with vision to
>>>>>>> assist mein connecting it. o I=20
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date:
>>>>>> 7/3/2007
>>>>>> 10:02 AM
>>>>>
>>>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>>>> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date: 7/3/2007
>>>> 10:02 AM
>>>
>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>
|
