Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:05:33 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey, we don't call them Crushcraft for nothing.
--Lou K2LKK
At 10:30 PM 6/24/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Richard,
>
>Years ago I had a Mosley SWL vertical and found the beefiness of the
>aluminum better than the Cushcraft R5 or Butternut HF 6V I've had since.
>
>Don't know if Mosley uses the same aircraft grade tubing in the verticals
>as they use in their yagis, but if so, it would be pretty strong. To me,
>the Cushcraft aluminum seems lawn chair grade and the Butternut somewhat
>better.
>
>I looked at the Mosley site, and noticed that some of the verticals are
>referred to as 1/4 wave with optional radials, but the others aren't called
>1/4 wave. Perhaps these are considered to be 1/2 wave like the Cushcraft's
>and they can get buy with no real radial system? Just like the Cushcraft's
>use those little decoupling stubs at the antenna base.
>
>73, Steve KW3A
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 4:09 PM
>Subject: mosley verticals
>
>
> > Hi group;
> > Just wondered if anyone had any experience with mosley verticals? A
> > picture
> > is always a thousand words but it didn't sound like there was a
> > counterpoise
> > but the also said that radials didn't make any significant difference. I
> > never did find anything on their site that gave me band width info.
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/872 - Release Date: 6/26/2007
>6:43 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
|
|
|