Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:43:34 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Comments: |
RFC822 error: <W> Incorrect or incomplete address field found and
ignored. |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> humans? Or are you just pointing out with your words above what an
> accepting human being you are?
>No, I'd call Wally a realist. I no longer try to convince someone that
>their (totally wrong-minded) diet is wrong, and they should eat my diet
>instead. Good way to get plenty of arguments and fewer friends.
Bingo. The way I'd state it is I'm not a prostelytizer (or hypocrite). If someone is eating something I don't approve of, I just look the other way. I do the same thing with smokers if the smoke is not bothersome. Now, if they say something about me eating meat (veggies often do), I will then proceed to shut them up with facts and figures and logic (veggies don't really like facts. Macros are even worse). I have done that a few times, though I've never been able to "convert" one :).
I guess my live-and-let-live philosophy does make me a bit touchy when others preach to me - especially when I know their rational is flawed.
|
|
|