PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:29:50 -0400
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<op.tycx5as9i9dzqs@localhost>
Organization:
some
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Correction: > Calling fat "lipid" does make make me confident
should read "> Calling fat "lipid" does *not* make me confident...

Brainfog strikes again. Been eating pears.

William

On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 18:59:24 -0400, William <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>
> Calling fat "lipid" does make make me confident that this is anything  
> other than a despairing ploy of the low fat campaign.
>
> People have eaten fat and fresh fruit/raw veg in the same meal for at  
> least thousands of years.
> Cancer was supposedly very rare until recently.
> Therefore the conclusion of this study appears to be crap.
>
> William
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2