BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Are there additional FRS channels in the 460 MHz range?
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:56:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Yes it is, but they do that because, in part, those bubble pack radios are 
so dirty, that's the best way to keep them from bleeding over form channel 
to channel. Also, that's what the business band channel split used to be. I 
think it's tighter now,b ut that's right in the middle of the public service 
and business bands up there so they have to stick with the spacing.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brett Winches" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: Are there additional FRS channels in the 460 MHz range?


> 12.5kc?  Isn't this wider than we use, 5kc? =20

ATOM RSS1 RSS2