Hey Chris how much are you charging Phil for that bit of advice?  lol just
kidding.

Lelia


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Gilland" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Please Check


> phil:  Found the problem!
>
>
> You have a </LI> tag at the end of your unordered list.  Why did you do
> that?
>
> That is probably the problem.  When you're doing a bulleted unordered
list,
> you don't have to end the list.  the <LI> (list tag) is not a switch tag.
> It's only a 1 way.  in other words here is the correct syntax:
>
>
> <P>here is a bulleted list</P>
> <P><UL>
> <LI>This is the first bullet.
> <LI>This is the second bullet.
> <LI>This is the third.
> <LI>And so on.
> </UL></P>
>
> See?  You don't end with a less slash l i.  That isn't proper HTML.  Trust
> me:  I am a web designer for a company and being paid for it too...  I
> should know.
>
>
> So, try taking out that slash l i tag, and let me know then, if she can
see
> it...  Your html looks flawless other than this, and if you are doing this
> in notepad straight from scratch, then, wait! ago!  You! are doing
> commendable!
>
>
> HTML's a hard thing to learn!  It's not, but yet, it is.  Don't let it
> discourage ya bro:  Take it one step at a time.  You have my e-mail, and
my
> number both...  Keep in mind, that I do this as a job, so thus i'm not
gonna
> be available always, but where I can, I'll be happy to work with you on
it,
> if you'd like...  just don't talk to me about java script!  LOL!  That's!
> where I draw the line.  Heheheheh.
>
> i usually just find a script for what I need, then copy, paste, and modify
> it accordingly.
>
> Anyway, I sincerely hope that this helps.  Your link did show up for me,
but
> that doesn't mean that the html is right necessarily.    That's one thing
> about html, vs. programming in a whole that makes html real hard:  You can
> get what are known as syntaxtual errors, yes, which are very similar to
> programming in that the code is not written correctly.  Where it differs
> greatly, however, is that it's kind a like taking a syntaxtual error and a
> symantic error and combining them.  Um:  by this, I basicly mean, let's
take
> your example here with that l i tag.  The link red just fine, for me, and
> probbly would even have worked had I went to it...  so, it isn't like it's
> producing falt in the page, it's just that the code isn't written properly
> which in term, could! in rare cases: cause undesirable results, maybe not
> for everyone but for some depending, A:  on how their browser is
configured,
> B:  if there browser supports what you are trying to accomplish, or even
C:
> if for that matter:  there opporating system supports it...  A good
example
> of the most latter is Java script under the text terminal console of
Linux.
> Or really unix in a whole:  if a person is using either linx:  L, Y, n, x:
> or Links:  L, i! n, k, s:  then java script will not work.  i think
Mozilla
> will do it in the gnome desktop environment but that's off topic and we're
> not discussing java script to begin with so, i'll leave that to your
> thinkings.  LOL!
>
>
> Take care:
>
>
> Love you in Christ.
>
>
> Chris.
>