Yep, we're up tommorrow.  Hillary was in Cheyenne today, Bill and Chelsea
were in Casper, and Barack's speaking in Laramie as I type.  The only reason
I'm not there is that I've had the flu all week and feel like I've been hit
by a truck.  But I'll be at the caucuses tommorrow if I have to crawl.  At
about 5:30, an Obama volunteer called asking for Janet, and he was very
pleased when I told him she was at the rally.  I'm about convinced that I'll
vote for the democratic nominee regardless of who it is, because I'm so fed
up with the Republicans.  One thing I've heard rumblings of is a
Clinton/Obama ticket in November, which might give McCain either better
targets to shoot at, or a unified party that would bring all the liberals
out of the woodwork.  I like Gore, but since he's not been running, all I've
heard his positions on recently have been environmental causes.  I'd like to
hear more about how he'd deal with the middle east and the economy before I
throw my support to him.  As for Clinton hammering Obama's lack of foreign
policy experience, he serves on the foreign relations committee, and she
serves on the armed services committee.  I don't think her experience as
first lady (including her experience as first lady of Arkansas) translates
to actual foreign policy experience.

Another thing that makes me nervous is Ralph Nader throwing his hat into the
ring.  It'll be a very clear choice between the democrats with either
Clinton or Obama as the nominee, and a Republican party led by McCain, and
I'm afraid Nader will pull more votes from the Democrats than from the
Republicans regardless of who the nominee is, even if a "Draft Al Gore"
movement succeeds.


On 3/7/08, Kathy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Yeah I know - I was thinking of you when I posted.  The way things stand
> now, I think Gore could be the deal-breaker for the Dems which would be a
> good thing in my mind!  It all depends on what happens in the next
> caucuses - I believe the next one is Wyoming.
>
> Kat
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "ken barber" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:08 PM
> Newsgroups:   bit.listserv.c-palsy
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Gore?
>
> > i metioned this possibility a few weeks ago before i
> > moved, but there was no reply.
> >
> > --- Kathy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> You all know how I feel about Al Gore.  If only this
> >> comes true:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Kat
> >>
> >> -----------------------
> >>
> >> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY
> >> list, go here:
> >>
> >>
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >
> > -----------------------
> >
> > To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
> >
> > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
> >
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
>


-- 


Kendall

An unreasonable man (but my wife says that's redundant!)

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress
depends on the unreasonable man.

-George Bernard Shaw 1856-1950

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy