GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
ABDOUKARIM SANNEH <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:26:18 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (195 lines)
Fye,
  Thanks for sharing the information. Any who is aware of issues of energy and environment knows that carbon economy is the basic human civilization is no longer sustainable. Fossil fuel is drying out and there is a need to look for alternative energy. With the political debate on the issues of global warming and climate change apart from energy crisis hydropolitic or water crisis is another issues. Sometimes I wander but our unsustainable consumption and production of resources is making our plannet more and more vulnearable with lot of anthropogenetic- human related factors. Lot do not unmderstand how current political issues have scientific factors. Resource poor countries are dragging into conflict because of human related influence on the environment. The darfur crisis is a show case example.

Fye samateh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
  > World oil supplies are set to run out faster than expected, warn
> scientists
> Scientists challenge major review of global reserves and warn
> that supplies will start to run out in four years' time
> By Daniel Howden
> Published: 14 June 2007
> Scientists have criticised a major review of the world's
> remaining oil reserves, warning that the end of oil is coming
> sooner than governments and oil companies are prepared to admit.
> BP's Statistical Review of World Energy, published yesterday,
> appears to show that the world still has enough "proven"
> reserves to provide 40 years of consumption at current rates.
> The assessment, based on officially reported figures, has once
> again pushed back the estimate of when the world will run dry.
> However, scientists led by the London-based Oil Depletion
> Analysis Centre, say that global production of oil is set to
> peak in the next four years before entering a steepening decline
> which will have massive consequences for the world economy and
> the way that we live our lives.
> According to "peak oil" theory our consumption of oil will
> catch, then outstrip our discovery of new reserves and we will
> begin to deplete known reserves.
> Colin Campbell, the head of the depletion centre, said: "It's
> quite a simple theory and one that any beer drinker understands.
> The glass starts full and ends empty and the faster you drink it
> the quicker it's gone."
> Dr Campbell, is a former chief geologist and vice-president at a
> string of oil majors including BP, Shell, Fina, Exxon and
> ChevronTexaco. He explains that the peak of regular oil - the
> cheap and easy to extract stuff - has already come and gone in
> 2005. Even when you factor in the more difficult to extract
> heavy oil, deep sea reserves, polar regions and liquid taken
> from gas, the peak will come as soon as 2011, he says.
> This scenario is flatly denied by BP, whose chief economist
> Peter Davies has dismissed the arguments of "peak oil" theorists.
> "We don't believe there is an absolute resource constraint. When
> peak oil comes, it is just as likely to come from consumption
> peaking, perhaps because of climate change policies as from
> production peaking."
> In recent years the once-considerable gap between demand and
> supply has narrowed. Last year that gap all but disappeared. The
> consequences of a shortfall would be immense. If consumption
> begins to exceed production by even the smallest amount, the
> price of oil could soar above $100 a barrel. A global recession
> would follow.
> Jeremy Leggert, like Dr Campbell, is a geologist-turned
> conservationist whose book Half Gone: Oil, Gas, Hot Air and the
> Global Energy Crisis brought "peak oil" theory to a wider
> audience. He compares industry and government reluctance to face
> up to the impending end of oil, to climate change denial.
> "It reminds me of the way no one would listen for years to
> scientists warning about global warming," he says. "We were
> predicting things pretty much exactly as they have played out.
> Then as now we were wondering what it would take to get people
> to listen."
> In 1999, Britain's oil reserves in the North Sea peaked, but for
> two years after this became apparent, Mr Leggert claims, it was
> heresy for anyone in official circles to say so. "Not meeting
> demand is not an option. In fact, it is an act of treason," he says.
> One thing most oil analysts agree on is that depletion of oil
> fields follows a predictable bell curve. This has not changed
> since the Shell geologist M King Hubbert made a mathematical
> model in 1956 to predict what would happen to US petroleum
> production. The Hubbert Curveshows that at the beginning
> production from any oil field rises sharply, then reaches a
> plateau before falling into a terminal decline. His prediction
> that US production would peak in 1969 was ridiculed by those who
> claimed it could increase indefinitely. In the event it peaked
> in 1970 and has been in decline ever since.
> In the 1970s Chris Skrebowski was a long-term planner for BP.
> Today he edits the Petroleum Review and is one of a growing
> number of industry insiders converting to peak theory. "I was
> extremely sceptical to start with," he now admits. "We have
> enough capacity coming online for the next two-and-a-half years.
> After that the situation deteriorates."
> What no one, not even BP, disagrees with is that demand is
> surging. The rapid growth of China and India matched with the
> developed world's dependence on oil, mean that a lot more oil
> will have to come from somewhere. BP's review shows that world
> demand for oil has grown faster in the past five years than in
> the second half of the 1990s. Today we consume an average of 85
> million barrels daily. According to the most conservative
> estimates from the International Energy Agency that figure will
> rise to 113 million barrels by 2030.
> Two-thirds of the world's oil reserves lie in the Middle East
> and increasing demand will have to be met with massive increases
> in supply from this region.
> BP's Statistical Review is the most widely used estimate of
> world oil reserves but as Dr Campbell points out it is only a
> summary of highly political estimates supplied by governments
> and oil companies.
> As Dr Campbell explains: "When I was the boss of an oil company
> I would never tell the truth. It's not part of the game."
> A survey of the four countries with the biggest reported
> reserves - Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and Kuwait - reveals major
> concerns. In Kuwait last year, a journalist found documents
> suggesting the country's real reserves were half of what was
> reported. Iran this year became the first major oil producer to
> introduce oil rationing - an indication of the administration's
> view on which way oil reserves are going.
> Sadad al-Huseini knows more about Saudi Arabia's oil reserves
> than perhaps anyone else. He retired as chief executive of the
> kingdom's oil corporation two years ago, and his view on how
> much Saudi production can be increased is sobering. "The problem
> is that you go from 79 million barrels a day in 2002 to 84.5
> million in 2004. You're leaping by two to three million [barrels
> a day]" each year, he told The New York Times. "That's like a
> whole new Saudi Arabia every couple of years. It can't be done
> indefinitely."The importance of black gold
> * A reduction of as little as 10 to 15 per cent could cripple
> oil-dependent industrial economies. In the 1970s, a reduction of
> just 5 per cent caused a price increase of more than 400 per cent.
> * Most farming equipment is either built in oil-powered plants
> or uses diesel as fuel. Nearly all pesticides and many
> fertilisers are made from oil.
> * Most plastics, used in everything from computers and mobile
> phones to pipelines, clothing and carpets, are made from oil-
> based substances.
> * Manufacturing requires huge amounts of fossil fuels. The
> construction of a single car in the US requires, on average, at
> least 20 barrels of oil.
> * Most renewable energy equipment requires large amounts of oil
> to produce.
> * Metal production - particularly aluminium - cosmetics, hair
> dye, ink and many common painkillers all rely on oil.
> Alternative sources of power
> Coal
> There are still an estimated 909 billion tonnes of proven coal
> reserves worldwide, enough to last at least 155 years. But coal
> is a fossil fuel and a dirty energy source that will only add to
> global warming.
> Natural gas
> The natural gas fields in Siberia, Alaska and the Middle East
> should last 20 years longer than the world's oil reserves but,
> although cleaner than oil, natural gas is still a fossil fuel
> that emits pollutants. It is also expensive to extract and
> transport as it has to be liquefied.
> Hydrogen fuel cells
> Hydrogen fuel cells would provide us with a permanent,
> renewable, clean energy source as they combine hydrogen and
> oxygen chemically to produce electricity, water and heat. The
> difficulty, however, is that there isn't enough hydrogen to go
> round and the few clean ways of producing it are expensive.
> Biofuels
> Ethanol from corn and maize has become a popular alternative to
> oil. However, studies suggest ethanol production has a negative
> effect on energy investment and the environment because of the
> space required to grow what we need.
> Renewable energy
> Oil-dependent nations are turning to renewable energy sources
> such as hydroelectric, solar and wind power to provide an
> alternative to oil but the likelihood of renewable sources
> providing enough energy is slim.
> Nuclear
> Fears of the world's uranium supply running out have been
> allayed by improved reactors and the possibility of using
> thorium as a nuclear fuel. But an increase in the number of
> reactors across the globe would increase the chance of a
> disaster and the risk of dangerous substances getting into the
> hands of terrorist
>
>
>
>
> (c) 2007 Independent News and Media Limited
>
> [log in to unmask]
>


[log in to unmask]

いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい


いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい

ATOM RSS1 RSS2