Well, that case was settled. So lets move on to the present one. We don't
really have the FS side of the argument. GW Micro claim that their
implementation of place-markers in the latest Window-eyes beta etc. is
different from - has nothing to do with - that (as set out in the suit) of
FS in JAWS. Why did FS pick place-markers as a particular instance? Most
JAWS users don't use them, anyway. Who else sues in the blindness AT field?
Who will FS's next target be, in a year or two from now?
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Poehlman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [VICUG-L] One AT Professional's Opinion RE: FS Vs. GW Micro
I take issue with the bullying notion. fs was being deluged with support
requests for "freedon" box.
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Signoff: [log in to unmask]
Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
Signoff: [log in to unmask]
Subscribe: [log in to unmask]