Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:43:47 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 08:59:54 -0600, Ken O'Neill <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>
> ... bespeaks a paucity of intellectual fortitude. ...
> ... compatible with the ramblings of The Flat Earth Society! ...
> ... Frankly, such a view is intellectual rubbish ...
> ...
> The claim "processed supplements are viewed as non-Paleo" is likewise
> rubbish, ...
I'm sure you realize that you are addressing a group. Most members of
that group have chosen not to debate you on these issues, or perhaps not
even to read your posts at all. I am now joining them in that decision,
not because your arguments are beyond debate, but because you insist on
taking a tone that is obnoxious and condescending. Perhaps you consider
these posts merely "passionate", but they definitely do not come across
that way. I always enjoy and welcome intelligent discussion, but you seem
as firmly rooted in your own dogma as you accuse others of being. This is
starting to look an awful lot like a religious argument -- and those
almost never benefit anyone. I can't speak for other list members,
obviously, but personally, I'm simply not going to discuss anything with
you unless you act a bit more civil.
--
Robert Kesterson
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|