C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Linda Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Cerebral Palsy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:19:05 -1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (107 lines)
uniquely horrible in that it is an entirely unnecessary war just my 
opinion and it is more brutal because of the length of time people 
are serving and the fact that Bush will send two parents in there 
causing incredible worry to the families and children. We never did 
things like that before. I guess I just kinda hope we've learned 
something since the Spanish inquisition and it's interesting that's 
the one you mention since we have Abu Ghraib.
Everyone responds to trauma differently. My father never raised his 
voice or his hand against anyone and he is a war hero so I am not of 
course talking about everyone.
In the child abuse work I do, I see some highly resilient people who 
have good lives to people who are just destroyed by the events even 
to the point of taking their own life.  We will be paying for this 
war emotionally and socially for a couple of generations. Of course 
not everyone but some returning vets won't be able to cope and they 
will act out in violence towards themselves and those closest to 
them. It is well known there is a high incidence of domestic violence 
inside the services.
And it bugs me that we primarily report our soldiers deaths but 
seldom report the number of displaced Iraquis because of our actions.
Anyhow this is taking away from the terrible inhumane way that woman 
was treated. We'll never know if she would have lived with prompt tratement.


At 04:40 PM 10/29/2007, you wrote:
>Linda, if your logic were to be applied across the board, there wouldn't
>be any vets who could  go back to civilian lives and get on with them.
>Remember that we have been in wars since this country was founded and
>there is nothing new about the traumas of war (well except for our
>capacity to quickly kill each other).  If you think our brutality in
>Iraq is uniquely horrible, may I refer you to any history of the Spanish
>Inquisition or the Roman Empire?  Violence, alas, is nothing new.
>
>Having said that I do agree  with you that we don't need to be in Iraq
>because we need to spend our money where it's better put to use, and I
>think we have done very little good by invading Iraq.
>
>Kat
>
>Linda Walker wrote:
> > Many of the soldiers being deployed are at Schofield next to where I
> > live. I feel like I live on a military base here.  We rent units to
> > soldiers and to private contractors who are also serving there. I have
> > been dealing with their problems as they come home. I am sure I have
> > talked to more of them than most American civilians. I have often
> > talked to them about whether or not they are going to re enlist and
> > other things. Believe me when I say these young men and women are
> > coming back very distraught and destroyed and they cannot seek any
> > psychological counseling without it negatively impacting their service
> > record.
> >
> > At 01:42 PM 10/29/2007, you wrote:
> >> Linda, I think your politics are showing.  I don't believe this fellow=
> >>  was a veteran of any current conflict.  The article referred to a
> >> 'brie=
> >> f army stint'.  I do believe the Guardian was trying to capitalize on=
> >>  his military service and subliminally link his military service to his=
> >>  crime without having to outright establish the connection--but that's=
> >>  typical of yellow journalism, both liberal and conservative.  PTSD may=
> >>  tear a mind down, but it doesn't turn whole groups of vets into
> >> cold-he=
> >> arted brutes.  How many vets do you know?  How many have you talked to=
> >>  about their experiences--or are you just repeating what you've been
> >> tol=
> >> d by the proponents of a particular political agenda?
> >> =20
> >> War is brutal to soldier and civilian alike, but you can't make
> >> sweeping=
> >>  generalizations about post-bellum behavior.  If your prediction were=
> >>  based in fact, we would have never recovered from the second World
> >> War.=
> >>   My father, who served in two conflicts, Korea and Vietnam, would have=
> >>  taken out his war-generated angst on his family, right?  A retired US=
> >>  Marine Lieutenant Colonel, he is the kindest, most gentle man I've
> >> ever=
> >>  known. =20
> >> =20
> >> War is supposed to be brutal, violent.  It is such an admission of
> >> failu=
> >> re and is testimony to the true nature of humankind.  The military is=
> >>  a blunt instrument--a hammer, where everything is a nail.  But nobody=
> >>  wants war less than the best soldier.
> >> =20
> >> Three years is harsh?  In most US states this would be conspiracy to
> >> man=
>
>
> >> slaughter and would have received 10-15 with parole at 7.  I highly
> >> doub=
> >> t that castigation from his neighbors is going to enhance his
> >> contrition.
> >> =20
> >> Kyle Cleveland
> >>
>
>-----------------------
>
>To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
>http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

-----------------------

To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:

http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2