BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
hank smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Jul 2007 01:32:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
is the broadcasting software speech friendly?
I tried this a while back and nothing read
has this been changed?
if not friendly can you give some pointers on using this software with a 
screen reader?
thanks
Hank
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL


> http://www.pirateradio.com
>
> mike
> amature call M0DMD
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of hank smith
> Sent: 11 July 2007 23:55
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
> recommend any?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "mike" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 2:43 PM
> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>
>
>>I will say this I spent years on a ship in the north sea doing just that
>> this is no different there is a way round like find a server in Canada 
>> for
>> instance
>>
>> mike
>> amature call M0DMD
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
>> Sent: 11 July 2007 21:50
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: OT INTERNET RADIO FAIRWELL
>>
>> Do what you like: have an underground or private stream, have a public
>> stream and pay the extortion, have a public stream and be prepared to
>> pay the legal defense...whatever. All I'm saying is that it's naive to
>> just say, "Oh, well, screw 'em and do it anyway" if you don't
>> understand what the potential rammifications could be. And they could
>> be very expensive. It could be OK if your case is enough of a
>> precedent setter for someone like (for instance) the EFF to get behind
>> and back you with legal defense funding, but if not, then what are you
>> going to do? Think I like this state of affairs any better than you
>> do? Don't count on it. But it's at least one reason I generally don't
>> buy records put out by the major labels...sure, some I do if I like
>> them enough, but there are precious few of those anymore, and I'd
>> rather go out of my way to find good independent artists and support
>> them instead. Which brings up yet another option. Set up a stream with
>> free pod-safe music, or music you have permission to stream. You're
>> more likely to find this with independent artists and small,
>> independent labels. I expect that this would likely be the most
>> effective way to combat this: hit the RIAA where it counts: in the
>> wallet, by taking your business elsewhere. Sure, you'll have music
>> most people haven't heard of, but does that make it any less good or
>> valuable? I'd submit to you that in fact it's *more* valuable, because
>> it puts your money where it should be going in the first place, and
>> besides, it helps stick it to the greedy record labels as they're
>> assembled with the RIAA.
>> -- 
>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV
>> Email: [log in to unmask] or phone 888-75-BUDDY
>> Get a free online mall and earn on 1000 stores:
>> http://www.powermall.info
>> From Kitchen Disaster to Culinary Master, make meals and baking
>> easier and faster: http://www.tastyshop.net
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2