BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:56:05 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (36 lines)
cool, i mean i have no problem with it but i have nothing to write it down 
with  so i guess thats the good part of it


pro is to con as progress is to congress


On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, ray t. mahorney wrote:

> You will not have to fulfill a code requirement after Friday.
> Ray T. Mahorney
> WA4WGA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "matt V" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: February 22, 2007 03:05
> Subject: [BLIND-HAMS] for when/if i take next test
>
>
> hello,
> just wondering, now that code is pretty much out from what i read, even
> though i am a tech plus, if i upgrade to general or beyond, is the code
> still part of the test or did they drop everything dealing with code, e.g
> even testing you for it?
> not sure, and i wouldnt be interested in this more than for the fact if
> anyone i know or might know was interested in radio, did they do away with
> novice class too or is that still the first license?
> or has that now combined into no-code tech or is it all screwed up from
> what i remember
>
>  pro is to con as
> progress is to congress
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2