Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:31:06 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One question for the major geeks out there.
I want to dual boot 3 separate XP Pro SP2 installs.
Which would be better all around; 1 big drive partitioned out, or 3
separate drives one for each XP install?
The major reasons are 1 for gaming, one to do my multimedia and
graphics work and the third for internet and office stuff.
I assume I would take a performance hit if I used one drive compared to 3.
I do have the room for 3 drives, but I'm also running IDE not SATA,
mobo has no SATA.
My specs are 2.4ghz intel cpu on a Asus P4S400 mobo, with 1-gig fast
memory (dual channel).
Also would I need to get separate licenses for each (XP)? Or would it
be legal to do this with just the one license?
I assume it would be ok since this is happening on one machine for just me.
Thanks
Brad Feuerhelm
The NOSPIN Group has added a new feature on our website,
web based bulletinboard for questions and answers:
Visit our sister website at http://nospin.com
|
|
|