Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:45:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>
A few people offered ways of thinking about resistance to screening for celiac.
Responses to the resistant:
1. So far the only thing that has worked for me is to promise to quit
hounding them if they will get screened to eliminate celiac as the
cause.
2. Sometimes I wonder if I go too far and people are sick of me
suggesting celiac.... kind of like -- just because you have it, that
doesn't mean that everyone else in the world does!
3. Lots of times people like the attention they get when they whine
about being sick...If they refuse testing, you can tactfully
suggest....that (you are sympathetic about illness but) don't need to
hear them complain unless they have ruled celiac out with
testing. ...No testing, no sympathy from you! ....This is especially
true if prescribed treatments from various conditions haven't worked
& they are being dx with new ones.
The sum of the replies gives me the feeling, to put it into one
oversimplified sentence, that celiac can sound a little cultish-an
unlikely-seeming condition with numerous but vaguely defined symptoms
requiring constant vigilance and a weird diet, and about which many
physicians are so skeptical as to be dismissive. If my sense of
things has merit, it's a view of ourselves as others see us, and
perhaps suggests ways of approaching the resistant.
We already know that we need increased public awareness, better
physician education and more accurate testing.
In the meanwhile, my experience suggests that emphasizing the dire
potential consequences of celiac just scares people off, particularly
if they have come to accept subpar health as normal. Underplaying
celiac seems to be more helpful because it is reassuring.
What do you suggest as potentially effective approaches?
The diet is obviously a huge hurdle. When people say "That must be so
hard!" I counter with remarks about how much I can eat, say it's not
nearly as bad as it sounds (I like the rat poison analogy), and maybe
add that it's pretty lucky to have something that can be so easily
treated.
Of course "easy" is a relative term. If it were easy to change one's
diet we'd be a slimmer nation subject to a lot fewer strokes and
heart attacks. So why were you able to go onto (and stick to) a
gluten-free diet? Feeling better is of course a huge motivator, but
we all embarked on the gluten-free diet before we'd proven to
ourselves that it works. Why do you think you were able to change
your eating habits?
Mary B.
NYC
* All posts for product information must include the applicable country *
Archives are at: Http://Listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?LIST=CELIAC
|
|
|